New Events


no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds



offsite link Ukraine Buys Huge Amounts of Russian Fue... Fri Jan 20, 2023 08:34 | Antonia Kotseva

offsite link Turkey Has Sent Ukraine Cluster Munition... Thu Jan 12, 2023 00:26 | Jack Detsch

offsite link New Israeli Government Promises to Talk ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 21:13 | Al Majadeen

offsite link Russia Training Iranian Pilots Ahead of ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:19 | The Times of Israel

offsite link Lukashenko Abolishes Copyright Protectio... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:05 | Nikki Main

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link News Round-Up Sun Feb 05, 2023 01:23 | Nick Dixon
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the virus and the vaccines, the ?climate emergency? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Woke-ism is Not Cultural Marxism Sat Feb 04, 2023 16:38 | Dr James Alexander
Professor James Alexander argues that woke-ism is not cultural Marxism, but an outcrop of liberalism.
The post Woke-ism is Not Cultural Marxism appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Bill Maher Takes Aim at the Woke Revolution Sat Feb 04, 2023 14:17 | Nick Dixon
American talk show host Bill Maher has taken aim at the wokies, comparing their efforts to cleanse society of moral impurity to Mao?s cultural revolution.
The post Bill Maher Takes Aim at the Woke Revolution appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Delilah Is the Latest Victim of the Woke Brigade Sat Feb 04, 2023 11:00 | Nick Dixon
The song ?Delilah? becomes the latest victim of the woke central planners. Aside from the sheer stupidity, and the deliberate ignoring of context, banning such songs is an attack on our harmless communal rituals.
The post Delilah Is the Latest Victim of the Woke Brigade appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link 80,000 Students Take Their Universities to Court For Refunds on Degrees Disrupted by Lockdown Sat Feb 04, 2023 09:00 | Will Jones
Almost 80,000 students are taking legal action and demanding refunds over the costly courses disrupted by Covid that left many without the skills they need for the fields they wish to work in.
The post 80,000 Students Take Their Universities to Court For Refunds on Degrees Disrupted by Lockdown appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire International Newsletter N°26 Sat Feb 04, 2023 05:43 | en

offsite link EU mulls ways to censor Russian views Thu Feb 02, 2023 04:34 | en

offsite link Zelensky's sponsor and Hunter Biden fall from grace Wed Feb 01, 2023 03:30 | en

offsite link Two perceptions of the war in Ukraine, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 31, 2023 07:03 | en

offsite link Pfizer modified Covid virus ahead of pandemic Mon Jan 30, 2023 13:28 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Why The Solution To The Great Recession Cannot Be Nationalistic?

category international | worker & community struggles and protests | opinion/analysis author Tuesday April 10, 2012 13:53author by Paddy Hackettauthor email paraichackett at gmail dot com Report this post to the editors

Much Of The Radical Left Want To Save Capitalism.

the perspective of David North’s is a narrow nationalist one. It limits the problem to one of the decline of US capitalism as opposed to the decline of capitalism as a world economic system. This means that for the WSWS the problems of capitalism are solvable within a merely nationalist framework. Such a framework only requires a mere restructuring of global capitalism. In contrast for communists the authentic solution is the elimination of capitalism through social revolution.

In a piece called “The Capitalist Crisis and the Return of History” David North, of the World Socialist Web Site, provides an outline of the financial led economic recession of 2008. For him the root cause of the crisis is located within the parasitic character of declining US capitalism. This decline is briefly outlined by David. However his analysis falls into the pit of nationalism. By circumscribing the crisis within US conditions he is espousing a nationalist ideology. For David the solution (following his logic) is to be found by replacing the leading role of the US in the capitalist system by another capitalist economic bloc such as the EU. Essentially it thereby confines the solution to the paradigm of the nation-state. The necessity of social revolution is not, then, for North a social necessity. He shares his nationalism with many other radical left organisations such as the Socialist Workers Party.

It is true that in the aftermath of World War Two the US economy was objectively the strongest economy in the world. As David says: “In 1952, nearly 60 percent of all industrial production in the advanced capitalist countries was located in the United States. On a per capita basis, total economic output in the United States was nearly double that in the United Kingdom and France, nearly three times that in Germany, and four times that in Italy. As late as 1957, 43 percent of the largest 50 companies in the world were based in the United States. Its dominant position found expression in its ability to maintain substantial trade and payment surpluses, even as the United States financed European and Japanese reconstruction.”

This meant that it produced surplus value to a greater extent than any other national economy. Because of the appalling condition of the rest of the world economy, in the immediate aftermath of the war, it was necessary, for economic reasons alone, that the US assisted in the recovery of these economies. Had the US not assisted these countries it was more than likely that their weakened state would eventually lead to the decline of the US economy and the total collapse of capitalism as a political and economic system. For political reasons too this assistance was necessary. If the US was to stave off the threat from an insurrectionary working class it was necessary that the US come to the assistance of other important countries such as France, Germany and Britain.

Eventually due to US assistance and the internal dynamic of West European and Japanese capitalism itself these economies recovered and expanded on such a scale that they became growing competition for US capitalism. As West European and Japanese capitalism increasingly expanded US capitalism started to relatively decline. David informs us that while “the United States remained the dominant industrial power well into the 1970s, it steadily ceded ground to its rivals in Europe and Japan throughout the late 1950s and 1960s. Second, the change in corporate structure and investment strategies within the United States was closely related to the rate of profit.”

This is why North draws attention to “the deterioration of the US balance of payments, the collapse of the Bretton Woods system on August 15, 1971, when the Nixon administration, without warning, suspended convertibility of the dollar into gold. This act represented a turning point in the post World War II history of capitalism. It unsettled the financial equilibrium that had made the post-war expansion of global capitalism possible. In the aftermath of August 1971, world capitalism became increasingly susceptible to destabilising shocks. Indeed,... the present crisis is in many respects the culmination of the process of disequilibrium that has been under way for the last 37 years or so

At a certain point West European and Japanese capital started declining too. Substantiating the above North claims that “the profit rate in the advanced capitalist countries fell one-fifth in the business and manufacturing sectors between 1968 and 1973. Many factors contributed to this process, of which the most significant was the massive (over)accumulation of capital in the aftermath of the war...By the 1960s the technologically advanced industries of Europe and Japan were competing effectively with the United States for position in global markets, including within the American domestic market itself. Growing pressure on global profit rates, increasingly apparent by the mid-60s, intensified international competitive pressures, which further weakened the global standing of US industry.”(bracketed part mine)

The result was sustained slowdown in the global capitalist economy as a whole. This development was a result of the laws of capitalism. The tendency of the general rate of profit to fall became increasingly more pronounced with the continuing accumulation of capital. The impact of this law increasingly diminished the scale of surplus value production. This forced capital to feverishly struggle to resist the falling rate of profit by increasing the technical composition of capital, the intensity of labour while pushing down wages, working and social conditions. The outcome of the impact of this capitalist law are cyclical crises of one sort or another leading to increased productivity entailing, among other things, further technological development. The cyclic character of capitalism is the secret of the capitalist mode of production’s inherent dynamism. If capitalism could exist in the absence of its life-cycle, brought about as a result of the law of the tendency of the general rate of profit to fall, nothing would exist to cause capitalism to technologically, politically and culturally develop. Consequently, assuming this possibility, capitalism would be inherently infected with stasis and thereby cease to be.

Now the life-cycle of capital is modified by the actions of the big capitalist countries at its core. The outcome is the persistence of cycles of a more irregular character. Historically capitalism’s cyclical nature undulates relentlessly through the system in one form or another. Capitalism’s cyclical nature means that capital consecutively undergoes crash, recovery upswing, boom, overheating and crash. It is an inevitable law of capitalism irrespective of the particular forms that capitalism may assume. A modification of the capitalist life-process by economic policies has mistakenly led many contemporary capitalist economic ideologues to declare that the cyclical pattern of capitalist development had been eradicated. Capitalism’s cyclical nature can only disappear when capitalism disappears.

David points out that the last merger waves (1984-89 and 1992-2008) “have been socioeconomic phenomena of decline, decay and extreme parasitism. The last waves have been powered by massive debt, the growth of which proceeded alongside, and demanded, the destruction of the real productive forces. The essential purpose...has been to destroy social wealth in the interest of investors’ profit and private wealth accumulation.” “Parasitic capitalism”, as David argues, “is not interested in creating value but in reallocating value” to itself.

Contemporary parasitic capitalism has a criminal aspect too.

As David points out:

“The phrase shareholder value is a social euphemism that is employed to conceal and justify the brutally exploitative, socially destructive and essentially criminal character of these financial transactions...”

David North is qualitatively on track in making the foregoing remarks. But he is off course by confining them to US capitalism. His remarks also apply to European and Japanese capitalism. And indeed should I say indigenous Irish capitalism too –builders, property developers and banks?

North later adds:

“The repeated occurrence of economic disaster cannot be explained as unfortunate accidents, which might have been avoided had investors been less greedy, executives more responsible, administrators more responsible, administrators more watchful, etc. Every five years or so, since the 1980s, there has been a major disaster. In the 1980s, the so-called “Decade of Greed,” there was the Savings and Loans scandal, the junk bond mania and the 1987 Wall Street crash. In the 1990s, there was the Mexican peso crisis, the bubble, the Asian crisis, the rouble crisis, and the collapse of Long Term Capital Management. In 2001 Enron collapsed almost overnight, when its fraudulent bookkeeping, in which prestigious accounting firms acted as accomplices, was exposed. Then, abetted by the decision of the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to their lowest levels in decades, the housing boom developed. Underlying all these speculative operations is the decay of the real productive foundations of ...capitalism, the separation of the process of the ruling class’s self-enrichment from the processes of production and the creation of real value.”

The devastating nature of the 2008 crisis is a testament to the inability of capitalism to provisionally recover unless capitalism is radically restructured as both an economic and political system. This must involve savage attacks on the working and living conditions of the working class. It is questionable as to whether the capitalist class shall succeed in realising such a radical agenda. This is because of the matter of both the objective strength of the working and its cultural quality. Furthermore such a radical agenda means the destruction of the weaker sections of the capitalist class thereby raising serious doubts as to whether the capitalist class will possess the unity to realise successfully such a challenging plan. But the point is that demands posed by capitalism’s relentless cyclical nature will force the capitalist class to struggle feverishly to restructure capitalism in its class interests and against the interests of the working class. Intense class struggle will ensue. The outcome of this struggle is a function of the ideological and political character of the working class.

In short, despite the merits of his piece, the perspective of David North’s is a narrow nationalist one. It limits the problem to one of the decline of US capitalism as opposed to the decline of capitalism as a world economic system. This means that for the WSWS the problems of capitalism are solvable within a merely nationalist framework. Such a framework only requires a mere restructuring of global capitalism. In contrast for communists the authentic solution is the elimination of capitalism through social revolution.

Related Link:
© 2001-2023 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy