Upcoming Events

National | Summit Mobilisations

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Ukraine and Wagner Team Up in the Murder... Wed Dec 07, 2022 19:10 | Anti-Empire

offsite link EU Leads the Way: Megan Fox Devastated t... Mon Dec 05, 2022 20:08 | Anti-Empire

offsite link US to Extend Ukraine’s Fires to 150 km... Mon Dec 05, 2022 08:46 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Podcast Mon Dec 05, 2022 03:26 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Paywalls and Stuff Sat Dec 03, 2022 22:43 | Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link The Islamic Republic of Iran, the US-Zionists-UK unholy trinity, and Domains of Grand Illusions Wed Dec 07, 2022 21:05 | The Saker
by  Mansoureh Tajik for the Saker blog We were defining success. Having lavishly financed and miserably failed all options that were on, under, above, besides, and in secret compartments of

offsite link Are Ukrainians Russians? Tue Dec 06, 2022 20:41 | The Saker
Are Ukrainians Russians? Seems like a simple question, but in reality it is immensely complex.  I will try to outline a few of the issues, assumptions and implications this question

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2022/12/06 ? Open Thread Tue Dec 06, 2022 07:00 | herb
2022/12/06 07:00:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link ­Die Einsatzgruppen ? Death Squads ? Eastern Europe: 1941-44 Mon Dec 05, 2022 17:02 | The Saker
By Francis Lee for the Saker blog During the Second World War in Europe, particularly in the East, special corps of mobile German extermination units known as ?Einsatzgruppen? (literally ?operational

offsite link The Yellow Vests at 4 years old: their 3 greatest historical achievements Mon Dec 05, 2022 16:46 | The Saker
By Ramin Mazaheri and cross-posted with PressTV On December 1, 2018, the Yellow Vests announced themselves to France, the world and the history books with their revolutionary graffiti tagging of

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

offsite link Formal complaint against Robert Watt Anthony

offsite link RTE bias complaint Anthony

offsite link Fergus Finlay and the maternity hospital ‘gotcha’ trap Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lisbon Referendum – Some Truth and Plenty of Lies

category national | summit mobilisations | feature author Friday September 04, 2009 23:39author by Chekov Feeney - WSM - WS111author email wsm_ireland at yahoo dot com Report this post to the editors

featured image
The Anarchists are Voting No!

One of the great problems that people encounter in making up their minds about the Lisbon treaty is that, depending on who you talk to, the treaty can appear to be an altogether different thing. According to those who are campaigning for a Yes vote, it merely serves to tidy up the existing European treaties, with a few changes to allow the EU to function more efficiently.

According to those campaigning for a No vote, the treaty would sign away national sovereignty, undermine democracy and workers' rights, increase militarisation and override Ireland's social and cultural ethos. And that's without mentioning the numerous alarming claims from the fringes that predict all sorts of catastrophes if the treaty goes one way or the other.



The great confusion surrounding the treaty is not just a consequence of the dishonesty of the political parties and special interest groups that are involved in the campaign, although that certainly doesn't help. The nature of the treaty very much depends on the context in which it is considered. If the general direction and trajectory of the EU is taken as a given and the treaty is considered in isolation, the Yes campaign's interpretation of the treaty appears to be more accurate.

There is very little in it that is likely to bring about any great change to the current political or economic direction of the EU or its member states. The most substantial changes primarily focus on the problem of allowing the EU state to take decisions more efficiently, in a way that is slightly more representative of population distribution.



It's only when you look at the bigger picture that the arguments of the No campaign begin to make sense. The EU is a state in slow formation which largely exists in order to enable the European states to combine forces in order to assert themselves economically and politically on the world stage.

Since its formation, there has been a series of treaties which have seen the member nations progressively cede sovereignty over areas of their affairs to the EU. Perhaps most importantly, the EU has served as a common political front for Europe's industrialists - negotiating trade agreements, setting tariffs and distributing subsidies in order to ensure that European industry remains internationally competitive.

Thus, despite the fact that the Lisbon treaty may not itself contain much that is new, it represents a significant step in further enabling European integration and continuing towards the goal of making the EU a global economic and political power.

This process will involve further centralisation of decision making power, economic reforms that continue to privilege property rights and free markets over social goals and workers’ rights, the development of a central military capacity and the gradual erosion of national identities in favour of a unified European identity.



Of course, it is unlikely that very many people campaigning on either side of the referendum will be altogether frank. The campaigning will be dominated by political parties and interest groups who are much more interested in winning the contest than they are in presenting a realistic depiction of the treaty to the public.

Yes campaigners will continue to present any and all concerns about the overall direction of the EU as some sort of xenophobic rejection of European civilisation. No campaigners will continue to find clauses in the text that they claim reveal the treaty’s enormous negative significance.



The big problem for the supporters of European integration has always been that they consider the population of Europe to be insufficiently mature to allow them to honestly consider the arguments in favour of integration. The people are too nationalistic, too economically ignorant and too sentimental to allow the rulers of Europe to openly propose the elimination of their nations and the formation of a European super-state, no matter how rational such a step might be.

Hence, they will concentrate on minute examination of the details of the treaty devoid of context alongside predictions of catastrophic consequences if the people should be so foolish as to reject “Europe”.



It is worth noting that the treaty amounts to little more than a redrafting of the defeated European constitution and is being presented to the Irish people for a second time, entirely unchanged, after being rejected. Its proponents are certainly not people whom one could accuse of having great faith in the democratic will of the people.



However, the No campaign also faces its own big problem. While it is easy to criticise the current direction of the EU, coming up with a convincing alternative is far more difficult. Rejecting the treaty merely means the retention of the status quo. Particularly in Ireland, it’s hard to see the EU state being any less democratic, honest, principled or competent than the hapless gombeens who run this place.

When it comes to alternatives, virtually none of the No campaigners are in favour, openly at least, of Ireland leaving the EU. It is indeed difficult to see how such a departure would result in anything other than a total economic collapse and the idea enjoys almost no public support. Those No campaigners who do put forward alternative proposals normally limit themselves to demanding a better deal for Ireland, despite the fact that such demands are generally unrealistic.



What this all means is that, for those who oppose the current direction of the EU, rejections of referenda are pretty pointless by themselves. In the absence of alternative ideas that are supported by large numbers of people, the status quo will reassert itself while Europe’s political machine will busy itself in coming up with a more successful way of advancing integration.

The real challenge is in coming up with effective ways of convincing large numbers of people that alternatives to the current logic of the EU are seen as both plausible and desirable.

Related Link: http://www.wsm.ie/lisbon

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   Alternative     Ronoc    Fri Sep 04, 2009 17:04 
   'sright     Granarchist    Sat Sep 05, 2009 16:54 
   No Better Deal     Coco    Sat Sep 05, 2009 20:51 
   identity is the crux     punter pete    Sun Sep 06, 2009 01:01 
   @punter pete + other stuff..     paul    Sun Sep 06, 2009 16:23 
   What is so wrong about a 'revenge' No vote?     Fred Johnston    Mon Sep 07, 2009 15:09 
   Air Campaign Shock and Awe     James Kelly    Thu Sep 10, 2009 17:04 
   The No side has had accurate quotes from the treaty     Khalid    Thu Sep 10, 2009 19:27 
   Farmers     France24 TV    Thu Sep 10, 2009 21:33 
 10   Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics     Michael Gallagher    Sun Sep 13, 2009 17:00 
 11   No Mention of Lisbon on Fianna Fail and Fine Gael Posters     Mark C    Sun Sep 13, 2009 18:58 
 12   Why would anyone vote yes??     paul otoole    Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:58 
 13   Ill Be voting YES     Anonymous    Mon Sep 14, 2009 14:02 
 14   Can we have another referendum...     Cynic    Mon Sep 14, 2009 17:28 
 15   Lisbon Treaty On The Rocks.???     p.ie gawker    Mon Sep 21, 2009 21:57 
 16   ERASMUS: more independent-minded than previous generations, and more willing to question authority.     dunk    Mon Sep 21, 2009 22:35 
 17   The 18-35 yr old voters deal with pregnancy differently..that's why they often use the word "-scare"     au pair    Tue Sep 22, 2009 00:25 
 18   "Let the Rulers rule"     Patrick    Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:23 
 19   bishops     cardinal rule    Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:39 
 20   Why?     Patrick    Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:11 
 21   This generation more conservative     Demographer    Tue Sep 22, 2009 14:04 
 22   YES Vote is now Unstoppable .     Surrendered to Lisbon    Tue Sep 22, 2009 14:18 
 23   Workers Rights the Last Trump Card     Analyst    Tue Sep 22, 2009 14:52 
 24   Get this to Joe Higgins for reply to the Bishops !     Analyst    Tue Sep 22, 2009 16:30 
 25   Corruption & Bluff     Mike hogan    Tue Sep 22, 2009 17:53 
 26   Openness and honesty     How    Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:34 
 27   Last hope for all     Jack Ravenno    Tue Sep 29, 2009 20:13 
 28   Spoil your ballot - no choice for workers!     Alan Davis    Wed Sep 30, 2009 15:49 
 29   Ignore alan the bolsheviks nonsense..     DontBeConned    Wed Sep 30, 2009 16:51 
 30   Did the bookies get it right - YES 1/25 : NO 1/8     a    Sat Oct 03, 2009 00:04 
 31   Artistic action against lisbon     a    Sat Oct 03, 2009 00:15 
 32   Early reports in via irish times map = @ 80 of island is so far NO     a    Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:23 
 33   Why is Ireland the only EU state which counts ballots the morning after they are cast?     carrotjuice anamoly    Sat Oct 03, 2009 14:36 
 34   Fianna Fáil's Theory of Evolution     Fred Johnston (who voted 'No')    Sat Oct 03, 2009 18:04 
 35   It doesn't matter......     LizardScum    Sat Oct 03, 2009 18:16 
 36   New doubts regarding eventual ratification of the Lisbon Treaty     Patrick    Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:51 
 37   Results are determined by preparation     Pierce Farrell    Mon Oct 05, 2009 17:00 
 38   NO to lisbon - PAT KENNY SHOW FROM DONEGAL ON NOW     arty eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee    Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:06 


Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2022 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy