no events match your query!
no events posted in last week
WE ARE AT WAR!!!!!!! 04:19 Feb 13 0 comments
Chelsea and the real war 02:58 Mar 13 0 comments
Half of All Children (in US?) Will Be Autistic by 2025, Warns Senior Research Scientist at MIT 19:54 Dec 31 2 comments
9/11 After 13 years Paul Craig Roberts 22:42 Sep 15 3 comments
The Latin pattern 15:51 Oct 06 0 commentsmore >>
Ukraine Buys Huge Amounts of Russian Fue... Fri Jan 20, 2023 08:34 | Antonia Kotseva
Turkey Has Sent Ukraine Cluster Munition... Thu Jan 12, 2023 00:26 | Jack Detsch
New Israeli Government Promises to Talk ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 21:13 | Al Majadeen
Russia Training Iranian Pilots Ahead of ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:19 | The Times of Israel
Lukashenko Abolishes Copyright Protectio... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:05 | Nikki Main
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
A few minor things Sun Feb 26, 2023 16:50 | The Saker
News Round-Up Thu Mar 23, 2023 01:01 | Will Jones
?Next Time a Prime Minister Intends to Abridge the Liberty of Millions, They May Remember the Scenes... Wed Mar 22, 2023 16:43 | Will Jones
FSU Podcast: The Problems with Police Training, eBooks Being Censored After You?ve Bought Them and O... Wed Mar 22, 2023 15:11 | Will Jones
When Will They Ever Learn? Wed Mar 22, 2023 13:00 | Thorsteinn Siglaugsson
The Gary Lineker ?Crisis? is a Distraction From the Real Problem with the BBC Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:00 | Dr David McGrogan
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international edition
Yeltsin's double game source of conflict over NATO expansion Tue Mar 21, 2023 11:57 | en
U.S. Escalation to the East, by Manlio Dinucci Tue Mar 21, 2023 03:34 | en
North Koreans join the armed forces Sun Mar 19, 2023 05:04 | en
Serious incident between Russia/United States in Black Sea Wed Mar 15, 2023 16:04 | en
EU Empties the Arsenals ... to Fill the Arsenals, by Manlio Dinucci Wed Mar 15, 2023 04:09 | en
National - Event Notice
Thursday January 01 1970
FEE block on the USI demo
national | education | event notice Thursday November 10, 2011 10:58 by FEE - Free education for everyone
Join the USI march & occupation of Molesworth street, Dublin 2
The USI have planned to march on the Dail in opposition to possible hikes in third level fee's. The campaign group Free Education for Everyone (FEE) believes that the USI should go further however & calls for the immediate retraction of increases in the reg fee & cuts to the non-adjacent grant. Education is a right not a privilege
The USI have planned to march on the Dail in opposition to possible hikes in third level fee's. The campaign group Free Education for Everyone (FEE) believes that the USI should go further however & calls for the immediate retraction of increases in the reg fee & cuts to the non-adjacent grant. The USI have made clear their plans to occupy Molesworth Street in order to put more pressure on the government through radical meassures. This is to welcomed, however for the action to be successful students must publicise the event and attend in huge numbers. Only through mass mobalization and direct action will the government be forced to take note of students demands. Assemble at the Ambassador theatre, Parnell Street at 12pm
View Comments Titles Only
Comments (4 of 4)Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4
Please change block to bloc. Apologies!
If the platform is for free education for all, then I don't think it is one that I will be supporting. Those who can afford to pay to go to third-level education, should have to pay for the privilege. Our Universities have become more and more semi-privatised education production lines. Fees should not have been abolished. We cannot and could never afford to subsidise the wealthy to attend college. Those who can't afford it, should be helped. To say that education should be free to all is hopelessly naive and just serves to maintain the status quo and exclude working-class people form colleges. Going to college is not easy nor should it be, however, there are many who can afford to pay for it. Common sense should prevail.
Currently the poor subsidise the rich attending college.
In practice figures show that free fees and the grant scheme have not significantly helped change the imbalance of people attending college from socioeconomically disadvantaged groups vs the wealthy sectors who continue to benefit from free fees. There are other issues here as well it seems. Maybe to do with social culture, hidden registration costs (stealth fees currently 2k+) and possibly the actual application procedures.
But money is still also an issue. It seems to me that a compromise is in order here.
There should be a base level under which you pay no fees then above that, a graduated scale and a cutoff point whereby the state no longer subsidises you either through fees or grants.
Thereby, helping poorer people to attend, whilst not subsidising the rich. Same principle should apply regarding childrens allowance.
If the 'free fees' initiative should be abolished because the 'poor subsidise the rich', isn't the logical extension that free primary & secondary education should also be abolished on the same basis?
College fees exist. At €2,000, they're the second highest in the EU.
They're not there for equity reasons - as fees have been increased in recent budgets, the maintenance grant has been cut. It's naive to believe that increasing fees will provide additional funding for third level institutions, or student support schemes. They will be (and currently are) used to reduce public funding. Increases in fees have already coincided with reductions to the core block grant.
Unwittingly, those that support fees on equity grounds are supporting the extension of the neoliberal model which fuels inequality - a model which despises public services, and seeks to reduce public funding by shifting the costs burden onto to individual, in order to maintain low taxes on wealth & profits. This is the same underlying process affecting water charges, the health service & other public services. The application of these neoliberal principles to tertiary education is not the answer to improving equality of access. It's this economic model itself which needs to be opposed.
The reason the 'free fees' initiative has had limited success is because the barriers to education don't suddenly arise on the day a student receives their CAO results, they arise through the cumulative effects of inequality in a multitude of areas from the moment they're born. The child of a 'professional' can expect to get about 92 points more Leaving Certificate points than the child of a 'manual worker'. Attempts to address this at third level are always going to have a limited effect.
Educational disadvantage doesn't exist in a bubble - class still matters. It's only by addressing inequality, both inside and outside of education, that equality of access can be genuinely improved.
One of the primary methods for achieving this - within capitalism - is through progressive tax reform. The additional public funding gained through taxation could be used to target educational disadvantage at all levels, through funding areas like pre-school education, special needs assistants, retention initiatives, reducing pupil-teacher-ratios, maintenance grants which reflect the cost of living, and the Back to Education Allowance. Additional public funding, based on taxation of those who can afford it, can be used to reduce inequality in areas outside the education sector.
As for the argument that 'we can't afford it' - most companies either don't pay pay corporation tax, or pay an effective rate of between 4-7%, according tho the head of Trinitys School of Business . Companies like Google uses tax avoidance schemes such as 'double Irish' to only pay €5.6 million in corporation tax on a turnover of €10 billion.  Taxes on wealth/capital, like CGT & CAT, also remain low.
The other typical argument is that higher taxes would 'damage competitiveness' . Higher tax economies, such as Sweden & Denmark, outperform Ireland in competitiveness rankings, according to the right-wing World Economic Forum. Part of the reason for this is that they use taxation to invest in areas like education, health, & infrastructure.
Shifting the cost burden onto students is not an economic necessity, it's a policy choice.
http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/abstracts/I...5.php , and another good article on corporation tax can be found at http://www.progressive-economy.ie/2011/04/125-per-cent-....html