Dominicans protest U.S. army reinforcements in their country
international |
anti-war / imperialism |
other press
Wednesday March 15, 2006 09:41
by Xinhua
Government says the U.S. soldiers only there to do humanitarian work
The Alternative Social Forum said that the real reason the U.S. army is present in the region is to control, dominate and interfere in the Dominican Republic's politics.
Dominicans protest U.S. army reinforcements in their country - March 15, 2006
Dominicans in the regions of Baoruco and Barahona staged protests as a new contingent of U.S. soldiers arrived in the Dominican Republic, according to news reports from the Dominican Republic Tuesday.
Although the Caribbean nation's government said the U.S. soldiers were only there to do humanitarian work, the Barahona Anti-Imperial Struggle Committee (CLAB) announced a round of anti-U.S. protests.
"We will return to the streets to call for the removal of U.S. soldiers from our soil," CLAB spokesman Jovanny Reyes told Dominican media.
CLAB demonstrated against the U.S. troop presence on Feb. 27, saying that those soldiers were not constructing rural clinics, as the government has said.
Another group of protestors, the Alternative Social Forum, said that the real reason the U.S. army is present in the region is to control, dominate and interfere in the Dominican Republic's politics.
The protestors said the U.S. troops also posed a threat to neighboring nations like Haiti, Puerto Rico, Cuba and Venezuela.
CLAB complained of constant overflights by three U.S. military helicopters in the region.
According to Lieutenant Colonel Angelica Reyes, head of the troops, the reinforcements, who arrived by military aircraft on Tuesday, went to the country only to build clinics in the settlements of La Lista, Batey Los Robles, Mena Arriba and Barahoma's Barrio Milton.
Source: Xinhua
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)
Jump To Comment: 1US derails efforts for democracy in Iran
Prominent activists inside Iran say President Bush's plan to spend tens of millions of dollars to promote democracy here is the kind of help they don't need, warning that mere announcement of the U.S. program endangers human rights advocates by tainting them as American agents, the WASHINGTON POST reports on Tuesday page ones,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20....html
Supposed health clinics supposed civilian airports in return for what
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) has been the principal U.S. agency for providing economic and humanitarian assistance to developing and "transitional" countries since 1961, though it spends less than 0.5% of the federal budget. It is "an independent federal government agency that receives overall foreign policy guidance from the Secretary of State". US foreign assistance has always had the furthering of America 's foreign policy interests, which includes supporting the US economy, US agriculture and US trade, as a key part of its remit.
The USAID website candidly states, "The principal beneficiary of America 's foreign assistance programs has always been the United States. Close to 80% of the USAID contracts and grants go directly to American firms. Foreign assistance programs have helped create major markets for agricultural goods, created new markets for American industrial exports and meant hundreds of thousands of jobs for Americans."