Republican Sinn Féin Poblachtach - Cork - Easter Commemoration Report - 18:32 Apr 09 1 comments Easter Rising Walking Tour 17:53 Jul 21 0 comments The War of Independence: Separating fact from folklore 13:52 Mar 27 0 comments Vol Frank Morris 02:24 Sep 24 1 comments Historian Caught in Ambush Row [Kilmichael Ambush - Tom Barry and Peter Hart] 14:03 Aug 27 5 comments more >>Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
The Establishment Figures Involved in Trying to Suppress the Story of Britain?s Rape Gangs Mon Jan 13, 2025 07:00 | Laurie Wastell
News Round-Up Mon Jan 13, 2025 01:14 | Richard Eldred
?It?s -3?C but I Can?t Afford to Put the Heating on Because of Rachel Reeves? Sun Jan 12, 2025 19:00 | Richard Eldred
?Islamophobia? and the Grooming Gangs Scandal Sun Jan 12, 2025 17:00 | Richard Eldred
How Wokeism Is Destroying the West Sun Jan 12, 2025 15:00 | Sallust |
Green Party Circulation on Tara today
national |
history and heritage |
news report
Wednesday July 25, 2007 18:42 by greenie
Gormley wriggles on the hook of tara This document was circulated today to green party members. Tara information note |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4there were 2 documents circulated. here's the second one
REPORT TO MINISTER (NO.1)
LISMULLIN ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
The Committee has met on two occasions so far. The main outcomes of these meetings were as follows.
At the first meeting held on 27 June last the following issues were discussed:
>The Committee’s Terms of Reference
>How the Committee will operate;
>Options and techniques for surveying the site of the monument and the surrounding area.
>Works required in preparation for a geophysical survey;
>Potential risks to the site.
During the course of these discussions the following were agreed;
a)That an on-site inspection by the Committee should be conducted as soon as possible (this was set for 10 July);
b)Weather permitting, that the existing protective covers should be removed and that more suitable alternative covering be considered;
c)That part of the monument outside the road land-take will be investigated to the extent possible; the adjoining landowner has no objection to the surveying of his land;
d)That a geophysical “chariot” would be too heavy for such a delicate site and that the geo-physical survey will be conducted by hand;
e) Aerial photographic coverage of the site (both vertical and oblique) would be taken to provide the basis for a detailed topographical survey.
During the course of the meeting the Committee was also briefed on and discussed the proposed release of documents relating to the Ministerial Directions for Lismullin; the Minister’s indication of his intention to consult widely on future archaeological policy and practice; the need for strong policies to avoid secondary development, particularly in the vicinity of the Blundelstown Interchange; the possibility of developing a Management Plan for Tara along the lines of the Boyne Valley Management Plan; the potential for the Minister to influence decisions on proposed developments in his role as prescribed body under planning legislation.
The Committee agreed that recommendations relating to the protection and management of the landscape in the Tara area as a whole should be included in recommendations to be put forward by the Committee.
At the second meeting held on Tuesday, 10 July the discussion focussed on site conditions, future works and the timeframe for carrying out these works.
Site Condition:
It was agreed by the Committee that the site was in a very vulnerable condition, could not sustain or withstand preservation in situ and that, therefore, excavation is desirable and in the best interests of the archaeological remains. The archaeological remains are suffering, particularly from rain water ingress and though this will be ameliorated with the introduction of a new plastic cover (see below), once the site has dried out sufficiently excavation should proceed. ;
It was agreed that the existing covers on the monument would be lifted on Wednesday 11th July; 5 –6 larger, lighter and more suitable covers have been sourced and these will be put in place over the next few days to minimise unnecessary traffic across the site;
All metal grid pegs etc will be replaced with bamboos as the plastic cover is being removed;
Heavy rain has led to considerable silt deposits which create an extra layer of cover over parts of the surface of the monument; as part of the excavation strategy these deposits will have to be carefully removed without eroding or damaging the under-lying archaeological features;
Weather conditions will be the key driver in determining both the time-scale and the measures to be put in place to excavate the site
Future Works/Timeframe:
The geophysical survey will take place in phases – outside the landtake, inside the land-take but outside the area of the national monument and within the monument site itself (this latter pending approval from the Advisory Group (see below));
In the event that weather remains unfavourable then consideration will be given to the alternative of undertaking geophysical survey and excavation contemporaneously;
The first phase of the survey by a geo-physical company from the UK will commence on Wednesday 11 July;
The results of the phase one survey will inform the basis on which further phases are to be carried out. This will include an assessment of the value of carrying out geophysical survey on the current surface of the monument within the roadtake and a report in this regard is due by Friday, 13 July;
Aerial photography will take place but this is weather dependent
Geochemical analysis of the site will take place as the site is being excavated or beforehand if possible.
Subject to the initial geophysical survey report on 13 July and a recommendation that the geophysical survey over the area of the monument within the road take would have a value , the Committee will be asked by phone or e-mail to approve the geophysical survey of the enclosure over the weekend (14th and 15th of July); it has since been established that because of the weather conditions a geo-physical survey over this weekend would not be possible.
A revised, dedicated archaeological methodology statement will be prepared considering the exact nature and configuration of the known remains, the possibility of multi-periodicity and what may be anticipated based on excavation and survey of similar monuments elsewhere.
The Committee will meet again on 18th July to advise, subject to Ministerial approval on the detailed proposals for the excavation of the monument site, to commence, weather permitting, on 23rd July. This aspect of the work is expected to take around 12 weeks to complete.
In overall terms the Committee has agreed:
That the excavation of the site within the area of the road-take and the preservation in situ of the portion outside the road was the best archaeological practice.
That, given the vulnerable nature of the site, and the imminent threats to its degradation by natural elements that the excavation should proceed as soon as practicable.
A further, more detailed report will be prepared when the initial results from the first geophysical survey are known and the conditions on the ground improve sufficiently to allow the other proposed works to proceed.
The NRA will prepare a revised Method Statement reflecting the discussion on the excavation strategy for the site and the recommendations from the Committee in that regard;
That the Minister will be provided with further reports as necessary at significant stages of the excavation programme;
Related issues raised at this meeting were:
Possible engineering solutions for boundary treatment of the motorway in the vicinity of the monument;
Future of that part of the site outside the motorway land-take;
The related issue of lessening the visual impact of the motorway in the Tara/Skryne valley;
Re-examination of the current methodology of machine soil stripping ahead of archaeological excavation;
The longer term lessons to be learnt in this particular case in terms of in informing the Minister’s proposed overall review of archaeological policy and practice, with specific reference to the issue of defining and protecting archaeological/historic landscapes.
The NRA undertook to provide an engineering input on methods of dealing with the motorway boundary in the vicinity of the monument and can arrange for an engineer to attend a meeting of the Committee at an appropriate juncture;
The Minister’s decision to release the documents relating to the Directions given for Lismullin was also welcomed by the members of the Committee.
The Committee was also advised that certain legal issues have been raised by the EU and must be responded to by the Department.
Advisory Committee on Lismullin, National Monument,
13 July 2007.
Was there a covering letter providing a context for this circular ? In what manner was it introduced?
...to help this revolting medicine go down!
For Minister Gormley to have done anything worthwhile in relation to Tara I'm afraid he would've really needed to want to.
Pre-election promises on such emotive subjects as this and the Poolbeg Incinerator ensured that they would stand a chance at achieving some degree of power. Nobody believed for a second that they would sell their souls to the Devil (well his right hand man) as well as all the REAL green supporters in Ireland in order to be affiliated with FF. Anybody wonder why Patricia McKenna was in tears just prior to the announcement that they were joining FF. What is it - an extra 90K+ p.a. for a Ministerial post - or so Mary Harney said during an interview?
I'm Green and proud of it. Unfortunately the Green Party I voted for has decided that Green is the New Yellow and seems to have lost their Green values - Shame on you.
The saying goes, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". It will never be 'shame on me' as I will never be voting for the current Green Party again and probably not any other alleged Green Party. Green candidates will be lucky to retain local county posts in the future let alone government.
How does it feel Minister Gormley to be at the behest of a man (BERTIE) that before this election repulsed you by his disregard of the Irish people and their country? How do you sleep at night? Are you finding people whom you referred to as friends have distanced themselves from you? No Minister, I don't expect answers to any of my questions because, no matter how important the questions are, the silence from the Green Party has been DEAFENING.
Another sickeningly sad day in Ireland!
The documents on Tara appeared on the Dept of the Environment website but they were circulating among party members before that apparently.
Here are the links to the documents on the website:
http://www.environ.ie/en/Heritage/Archaeology-NationalM...n.htm
and
http://www.environ.ie/en/Heritage/Archaeology-NationalM...n.htm
This is the latest video link as well:
http://www.livevideo.com/video/1C1710A516DD43F2BE33544D...23677
and check out the latest blogspot
http://www.everydayispaddysday.blogspot.com/