Parse failure for https://anti-empire.com/feed/. Last Retry Wednesday January 14, 2026 23:07
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Trump hosts former head of Syrian Al-Qaeda Al-Jolani to the White House Tue Nov 11, 2025 22:01 | imc Was that not what the War on Terror was about ?
Today things finally came full circle. It was Al-Qaeda that supposedly caused 9/11 and lead to the War on Terror but really War of Terror by the USA and lead directly to the deaths of millions through numerous wars in the Middle East.
And yet today the former head of Syrian Al-Qaeda, Al-Jolani was hosted in the White House by Trump. A surreal moment indeed.
In reality of course 9/11 was orchestrated by inside forces that wanted to launch the War of Terror and Al-Qaeda has been a wholly backed American tool ever since then.
Rip The Chicken Tree - 1800s - 2025 Tue Nov 04, 2025 03:40 | Mark That tree we got retained in 2007, is no more
2007
http://www.indymedia.ie/art...
2025
https://eplan.limerick.ie/i...
Study of 1.7 Million Children: Heart Damage Only Found in Covid-Vaxxed Kids Sat Nov 01, 2025 00:44 | imc A major study involving 1.7 million children has found that heart damage only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines.
Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from heart-related problems.
In addition, the researchers note zero children from the entire group, vaccinated or unvaccinated, died from COVID-19.
Furthermore, the study found that Covid shots offered the children very little protection from the virus, with many becoming infected after just 14 to 15 weeks of receiving an injection.
The Golden Haro Fri Oct 31, 2025 12:39 | Paul Ryan Disability Fine Lauder and Passive Income with Financial Gain as A Motive
Why not make money?
Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children Sun Oct 05, 2025 21:31 | imc A comprehensive study by leading pediatric scientists has confirmed that the devastating surge in heart failure among children is caused by Covid mRNA shots.
The peer-reviewed study, published in the prestigious journal Med, was conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong.
The team, led by Dr. Hing Wai Tsang, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, uncovered evidence to confirm that Natural Killer (NK) cell activation by Covid mRNA injections causes the pathogenesis of acute myocarditis.
Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body?s ability to pump blood. The Saker >>
Ed Miliband?s Most Brazenly Dishonest Claims Yet Wed Jan 14, 2026 19:00 | Paul Homewood Ed Miliband has made his most brazenly dishonest claims yet, says Paul Homewood. A press release states that new wind power will be cheaper than gas. But that's only because a big chunk of gas 'costs' are carbon taxes!
The post Ed Miliband’s Most Brazenly Dishonest Claims Yet appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
As ?Net? Migration Drops to Zero Don?t Be Fooled Wed Jan 14, 2026 17:31 | Will Jones Net immigration is headed to zero this year, but don't be fooled. Inward migration is still eye-wateringly high. The 'net' figure is only going down because so many young Brits are fleeing Starmer's Britain.
The post As ‘Net’ Migration Drops to Zero Don’t Be Fooled appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Maccabi Police Chief Must Go, Says Home Secretary Wed Jan 14, 2026 15:30 | Will Jones Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said she no longer has confidence in Craig Guildford, the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police at the centre of the Maccabi Jewish fan ban row, and he should be sacked.
The post Maccabi Police Chief Must Go, Says Home Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Obituary: Scott Adams (1957?2026) Wed Jan 14, 2026 13:00 | Alastair Lewis Scott Adams is gone. Or, to use his own language, he has successfully transitioned out of this particular simulation. To the world, Scott was the guy who drew Dilbert. If you were paying attention, that was just the start.
The post Obituary: Scott Adams (1957?2026) appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Digital ID is Dead. Now What? Wed Jan 14, 2026 11:08 | Anonymous IT Reporter Following Sir U-Turn's latest backtrack, compulsory digital ID is dead (once again), at least for now. What should be the response of those on the Right, who care both about privacy and property rights?
The post Digital ID is Dead. Now What? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
No Cutbacks for Leinster House Parties
national |
anti-capitalism |
news report
Tuesday December 15, 2009 23:24 by éirígí PRO - éirígí

With so much attention being focused on the cuts to social welfare and public sector pay the little matter of the taxpayer funding of political parties has been neglected. Hard as it is to believe the budget of all the Leinster House parties was untouched in Lenihans cutback free-for-all. The question must now be answered of all the parties - will you continue to take your full allocation of taxpayers money while the poor go hungry?
 The five political parties in Leinster House have all played their part in bringing the state to the brink of economic disaster.
Whether directly, as in the case of Fianna Fáil and the Green Party, or through their support for the ‘need’ for cuts in public sector pay or services, as in the case of the Fine Gael and the Labour Party, or through their support for the bank guarantee scheme, as in the case of Sinn Féin, the entire political establishment in Leinster House bears some responsibility.
Brian Lenihan has acknowledged the consensus that exists within Leinster House about cuts in public sector pay and services: “It is of enormous benefit that the main political parties in this House share a common understanding of the extent of our difficulties. And even if we disagree on how to solve our problems, our agreement on the amount of savings required sends a powerful signal to the rest of the world that we are able and willing to put our own house in order.”
Last week’s budget has confirmed the Twenty-Six County government’s determination to steal from blind people, young people, carers, educators and people with disabilities so they can rescue the bankers, developers and stockbrokers. A case of robbing from the poor and giving to the rich if ever was one. And all to keep their masters in the International Monetary Fund and European Commission happy.
Spokespeople for the Dublin government have being lining up to defend their savage budget, claiming that, while they really, really hate having to implement cuts on the most deprived people in society, they just have no option. Indeed, according to them, ‘there is no alternative’. At the same time, they are more than content to fill a large trough of money for their own political party machines to gorge on.
Figures from the Standards in Public Office Commission will surely leave a bitter taste in the mouth of the unemployed and others welfare payment recipients. In 2008, the five Leinster House parties received over €5,600,000 (£5 million) in funding directly from taxpayers and a further €8,132,241 (£7.3 million) in the form of a Party Leaders Allowance. This figure represented an increase of €200,000 (£180,000) on the 2007 figure. No recession for the political golden circle then.
So, how did the political class spend all this money which the tax-payer has so generously conferred upon them? Did they, for example, splash out on bringing citizens closer to the political system? After all, the establishment parties consistently claim they are deeply concerned about what they call a ‘disconnect’ between citizens and the political system. Perhaps they organised public engagements the length and breadth of the Twenty-Six Counties telling citizens all about the wonderful work that’s being done in Leinster House and asking people what they think should be the political, or policy priorities of the day.
Hardly. Instead, they spent quite a substantial sum on ‘general administration’. In other words, they spent the hard pressed tax-payers’ money on running their own much valued ‘political machines’. It takes a lot, it seems, to administer the Fianna Fáil party; a whopping €1,547,050 (£1.4 million), to be exact. While €1.5 million (£1.3 million) was spent on administration, the rather paltry sum of €40,000 (£36,000) was spent on encouraging youth involvement in politics. This is not altogether surprising from a party that has shown absolute contempt for young people, as evidenced by Brian Lenihan’s decision to cut social welfare payments for young people by at least half and the reduction in the third level student maintenance grant.
Fine Gael is not too far behind the Soldiers of Destiny. The Blueshirts shamelessly spent almost €630,000 (£565,000) of working peoples’ taxes on what is termed ‘Co-ordination of Branches and Members’ and a further €840,000 (£753,000) on the political establishment’s much cherished ‘general administration’. With all this money swilling about their organisational structures, is it little wonder that these parties show contempt for the poor and the hard working who, they argue, should be made to pay for the greed of the business class.
Unfortunately the excesses don’t end there though. Both the Labour Party and the Green Party require substantial amounts of your money to ‘generally administer’ their collective party ‘machines’.
Labour, it seems, required €481,902 (£432,000), while the Green Party, one of the smallest political parties in Ireland, and clearly anxious to replicate the excesses of their partner in government, spent just over €312,000 (£280,000).
Sinn Féin and the now defunct Progressive Democrats both shared rather expensive tastes in ‘general administration’, with both parties spending just over a quarter of million euro each. The PD’s were fond of the concept of ‘competitiveness’, ‘free-markets’ and ‘deregulation’ while in government, yet it seems these fundamental principles don’t extend to the political party system, which is a highly regulated closed shop. Little wonder there is such consensus within Leinster House.
To top it off, the parties between them spent over €61,000 (£55,000) on ‘education’ for its members. The Green Party spent €28,350 (£25,000) on this one; it could only be for a rather expensive playschool for their Dublin Mid West TD Paul ‘F**k You’ Gogarty.
While the political parties received over €5 million (£4.5 million) from the Political Party Fund, the tax-payers’ generosity doesn’t end there. While the rest of us are told to ‘tighten our belts’ and are assured that we are ‘all in this together’, there appeared to be little by way of belt tightening from the portly political set.
That’s because there is a second money trough available to them. This particular slush fund is termed Expenditure of Party Leaders Allowance. While the vast majority of tax-payers are probably unaware that such a fund even exists, the political parties aren’t shy about dipping their snouts in it. It is, after all, quite a substantial trough, an €8,132,241 one to be precise.
The appetite for ‘general administration’ it seems is insatiable: all the parties combined received just shy of €4 million (£3.6 million). Fianna Fáil’s voracious membership gobbled up another €1,923,683 (£1.7 million). It’s hungry work taking money off blind people. Given the substantial sums of money involved, it wouldn’t be outrageous to assume that ‘general administration’ actually means that the parties employ people to count all of this money that the tax-payer has kindly, if unknowingly, donated.
Fine Gael is a big spender here too. Their cashiers, or, as they prefer to call them, ‘general administrators’ cost the taxpayer over €740,000 (£663,000) in 2008. But at least the Blueshirts are keen to hear the views of voters. So much so that they spent €266,000 (£239,000) on ‘polling’ or trying to find out what we are all thinking. It’s probably safe to assume that a lot of people are thinking that they want their money back.
The cash registers were ringing over at Ely Place and Parnell Square too. Over on the southside, the Labour Party Headquarters at Ely Place ‘generally administered’ over €1.1million (£986,000) that could have been spent on health or education. In comparison, it is a little cheaper to ‘generally administer’ a political party from the northside of the River Liffey, with a mere €168,182 (£151,000) finding its way into Sinn Féin coffers at Parnell Square.
The downtrodden TD is never shy of telling us how generous they are to various causes. The same seems to apply to their party leaders. Perhaps they donate large chunks of this taxpayers money to worthy causes.
Maybe the National Society of the Blind or St Vincent de Paul are worthy recipients of the party leaders’ fondness for charitable causes. Well, actually, they’re not.
The largest and, in fact, only recipients of ‘donations’ from the party leaders fund are, surprisingly enough, their own political parties. Except, when giving your money to their own parties, they like to give it a nice technical or, one might say, accounting term, such as ‘purchases for party services’. You might be surprised to hear that the tax-payer through the political party leaders purchased €1.5 million (£1.3 million) worth of ‘party services’, with Fine Gael, at €1.1 million, benefiting the most from this handy little accounting device. If that wasn’t enough, Fine Gael’s Enda Kenny threw himself €48,344 (£43,000), for what is not entirely clear.
With their minds so full of euro signs, they are obviously unable to do any thinking for themselves, so the Leinster House political parties have to hire PR consultants, policy analysts and ‘technical’ specialists to do it for them. And, once again, the tax-payer has come to the rescue: to the tune of €870,143 (£780,000). One wonders did these policy and technical whizz-kids come up with the plan to take €8.37 (£7.50) per week from those on blind pension?
According to the Twenty-Six County Department of Social and Family Affairs Annual Report 2008, there were a total of 1,472 recipients of the blind pension who each receive a paltry €204.30 (£183.10) per week. By taking €8.37 off them, Brian Lenihan will ‘save’ the taxpayer a total of €640,673 (£574,186), which is actually €229,470 (£205,651) less than what the tax-payer spent on technical specialists, policy analysts and PR consultants for the political parties.
The pigs at the trough of Leinster House have been doing a lot of grunting recently about the public sector. According the vast majority in the Leinster House piggery, public sector workers are overpaid and underworked. And, as such, the lowest paid of them deserve to have their wages cuts by five per cent. Unemployed young people should be forced to get by on €100 (£90) per week, while blind people will just have to survive on €194 (£174) per week and be content to know that, according to the minister of finance, “we are all in this together”.
Everyone, according to the Twenty-Six County political establishment, are taking the pain ‘equally’. The figures from the Standards in Public Office prove that some are more equal than others. By taking €13 million (£11.7 million) worth of tax-payers’ money to fund themselves and screw the most vulnerable in society, they are effectively telling us in the words of one of the more ridiculous of the Leinster House ‘pigs’ to go and ‘f**k ourselves’ because there is only enough room at the trough for the political class.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (14 of 14)