Cops welcomed with smoke bombs and flares Dublin Pride 19:57 Jul 14 0 comments Gemma O'Doherty: The speech you never heard. I wonder why? 05:28 Jan 15 0 comments A Decade of Evidence Demonstrates The Dramatic Failure Of Globalisation 15:39 Aug 23 1 comments Thatcher's " blind eye" to paedophilia 15:27 Mar 12 0 comments Total Revolution. A new philosophy for the 21st century. 15:55 Nov 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireNorth Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi? ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi? US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Lockdown Skeptics
Britons Believe 2025 Will Be Worse Than 2024 in Blow for Starmer Sat Dec 28, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
Councils Set to Slap Britons With On-the-Spot Fines for Climbing Trees in Parks Sat Dec 28, 2024 15:00 | Richard Eldred
Civil Servants to Strike Over ?Victorian? Demand to Spend Three Days in the Office Sat Dec 28, 2024 13:00 | Richard Eldred
?Woke? MoD Bosses to Strip Cross From Military Cap Badge Sat Dec 28, 2024 11:00 | Richard Eldred
Was Rachel Reeves ?Let Go? by Both the Bank of England and HBOS? Sat Dec 28, 2024 09:00 | David Craig
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionVoltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en |
PBPA Make Complaint Against Senator Rónán Mullen
national |
miscellaneous |
opinion/analysis
Tuesday August 10, 2010 19:25 by George Hill - no organisation
Genuine Complaint or Publicity Stunt? The People Before Profit Alliance have made an official complaint against Independent Senator Rónán Mullen in relation to reports he made in Seanad. This raises questions about PBPA's judgement and their approach towards elected office. The media have been full of stories about Senator Ivor Callely and his alleged abuse of the expenses system while he was a TD and since 2007 as a Senator. Yesterday the Seanad Committee charged with the task of investigating possible abuses named four Senators that they will be writing to for further explanation. Fianna Fáil Senators Ivor Callely, Ann Ormonde and Larry Butler are being questioned; but so is Independent Rónán Mullen on foot of an official complaint from the People Before Profit Alliance. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4I did wonder about this alright. It seems a very strange thing to complain someone over something so trivial. Politically I find Ronan Mullan as distasteful as I'm sure PBPA/SWP do, but I can see no sense here.
While one might consider the complaint to be vexatious, Mullen has not helped himself by failing to name the individual who allegedly made the remark. Abuse of public funds/office is not a laughing matter and should not be treated as such.
The point is that this is a complete own goal by PBPA/SWP. Mullen should not have to name names. In fact, it's good that he did report on the type of chit-chat that goes around in the Leinster House bar. But it's exactly that, chit-chat. Barstool statements should not be taken too seriously. Yes, there the person in question may have had complete disrespect for the public funds. Yes, he may have been serious in his suggestion to Mullen. But equally it could have been stupid pub-talk. Mullen was there and will be best judge.
The PBPA seem to have a very immature attitude. It's all "ra ra ra" on issues like this - no sustance, just slogans. Their elected representatives have obviously never been told something in confidence yet. Their new councillors and candidates are very wet behind the ears, but if they manage to stay on in elected office for any longer they will realise that you can't always 'name names' and 'expose' people.
In the minds of many people Mullen was correct to report the chi-chat in Leinster House and has been fairly up-front about expences. For PBPA to complain about him is seen as immature, petty and motivated by other political reasons. PBPA/SWP don't come out well from this completely misguided vexatious complaint.
Abuse of public funds is not a joking matter. For all you know the other individual may be serious. Who is to say that Mullen is making a proper decision based on good judgement. The Government has repeatedly misinformed us over the whole bank guarantee. Are we going to say that it is ok because they were there there the night it was decided on so they are in the best position to judge i.e. the same defence you offer for Mullen?
Time has repeatedly shown us that most of our politicians are dishonest so all suspicious comments and behaviour should be reported. If Mullen thought enough of the comment to mention it, then he obviously had some suspicion. He should forward the name so that the person in question can be investigated. If they have nothing to hide then there is nothing for them to worry about.