Australia sees 63% drop in births after introduction of covid “vaccines” – what will t... 23:10 Nov 22 0 commentsmore >>
A Blog About Human Rights
UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights
5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Legendary Investigative Reporter Seymour Hersh Says Nord Stream 2 Was Blown Up by U.S. Navy Wed Feb 08, 2023 18:14 | Toby Young
Guardian Lives to Regret Asking Women to Share Experiences of Online Misogyny Wed Feb 08, 2023 11:55 | Will Jones
The Questions I Want the Chief Medical Officer to Answer About Why We Are Vaccinating Babies Against... Wed Feb 08, 2023 09:00 | Hugh McCarthy
No, Wind and Solar Power is Not ?Cheaper Than Coal? Wed Feb 08, 2023 07:00 | David Craig
News Round-Up Wed Feb 08, 2023 00:45 | Will Jones
Voltaire, international edition
The Hunter Biden / Ihor Kolomoïsky affair, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Feb 08, 2023 05:24 | en
Use of chemical weapons by a Ukrainian unit Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:14 | en
?360° Cooperation with Libya.? But Which Libya?, by Manlio Dinucci Tue Feb 07, 2023 07:29 | en
Voltaire International Newsletter N°26 Sat Feb 04, 2023 05:43 | en
EU mulls ways to censor Russian views Thu Feb 02, 2023 04:34 | en
UK Government Warns Doctors About Infertility Possibility with Pfizer COVID Vaccine, But NO Warning to Patients!
international | health / disability issues | other press Monday December 07, 2020 22:54 by bi - Vaccine Impact
Risks of infertility due to vaccine hidden in the depths of documentation
As was reported earlier this week, the U.K. became the first nation to issue emergency authorization for the Pfizer experimental mRNA COVID vaccine, with jabs expected to start with the public any day now. See: BREAKING! UK First to Approve Pfizer COVID Vaccine as Former Head of Pfizer Research Says Vaccine Can Make Females Infertile
In the leaflet for recipients, it gives strict warnings to women who are pregnant and breast-feeding
Pregnancy and breast-feeding
However, in the longer document issued to “Healthcare Professionals,” it gives an additional warning (see red highlight):
Why was this warning not included in the leaflet to be distributed to the recipients of the vaccine? The leaflet to the recipients starts out with this text:
So after someone reads the shorter leaflet prior to deciding whether or not to get the vaccine, the only way a young woman would know about the warning about potential infertility issues, would be if they asked their doctor or other healthcare provider a specific question about fertility.
And even then, it is dependent upon that doctor having completely read the longer document, and answering the young woman’s question on fertility issues accurately.
If you live in the UK, please print out the longer document published for the doctors, and make sure everyone you know who is considering getting this vaccine reads it, and not just the shorter document published for “recipients.”As we have previously reported, Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, filed a STAY OF ACTION with the European Medicines Agency, together with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, and he warned them about the potential effects of this vaccine on fertility, as he wrote that the experimental Pfizer COVID vaccine is:
Why Only People Over the Age of 16?
The other issue brought out in these guidelines that raises serious questions, is why are they only recommending the vaccine for individuals over the age of 16? They state:
But one of the trial groups that tested the vaccine had children between the age of 12 and 15. From the longer document for doctors:
Unless I am missing something here, or my math is off, if there were 44,000 participants in Study 2 that were 12 years of age and older, and “21,720 participants 16 years of age or older received at least one dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b and 21,728 participants 16 years of age or older received placebo,” then that means 552 participants were children between the age of 12 and 15.
That is more than the total of Study 1, which included only 60 participants between the age of 18 and 55.
So what happened to these children between the ages of 12 and 15? They were obviously included in the study for a reason. Did parents actually give their consent to include these children? Or were they wards of the Government having been medically kidnapped from their parents, so that consent was not necessary?
Also, what is the percentage of participants above the age of 55, the group most at risk? They were not even included in Study 1, for some reason.