New Events


no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds



offsite link America Is on the Move! — Millions Tak... Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:00 | Business Standard

offsite link DeSantis Extends Order Baring Local Gove... Thu Nov 26, 2020 09:00 | Hannah Bleau

offsite link Prominent COVID Cultist, “Dr. Mike”,... Thu Nov 26, 2020 08:00 | Martin Gould

offsite link “We’re All in This Together!” — ... Thu Nov 26, 2020 07:00 | Alexandre Tanzi

offsite link Russia Can, the United States Can’t Cu... Thu Nov 26, 2020 06:00 | Alexei Anpilogov

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 election Thu Nov 26, 2020 01:09 | The Saker

offsite link Trump?s last hurrah?! Wed Nov 25, 2020 22:45 | The Saker
[this analysis was written for the Unz Review] There seems to be a quasi consensus that Trump will not prevail and that Biden and Harris will get into the White

offsite link Why Did RT Hire Liberals That Are Bringing Harm to Russia? (Ruslan Ostashko) Wed Nov 25, 2020 17:55 | Leo V.
Translated and captioned by Leo. Guess who started the cycle of documentaries about the ?main people of the country? on the state channel RT Russia? From the editor-in-chief of the

offsite link China Newsbrief and Sitrep Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:54 | amarynth
By Godfree Roberts ? selected from his extensive weekly newsletter : Here Comes China This is why we study China. There is no point in believing we can make sense

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/11/25 ? Open Thread Wed Nov 25, 2020 05:30 | Herb Swanson
2020/11/25 05:30:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link David Quinn’s selective tolerance

offsite link A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

offsite link Irish Examiner bias Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Classroom Assistants demand the truth

category antrim | worker & community struggles and protests | news report author Sunday November 11, 2007 12:57author by . - . Report this post to the editors

Hold them to account

As part of the Classroom Assistants ongoing battle for justice they are demanding to know the truth about the current offer made by management.

Below is the text of a letter that will be sent to all Stormont MLAs


Management, Stormont Assembly members and the press are pressurising Classroom Assistants to accept the current offer in the Classroom Assistants job evaluation dispute. This is despite the fact that there are major questions over the financial accuracy of the offer.

The figures quoted in the press by Assembly members and Management change on an almost daily basis. Initially in 2003 Management believed that the cost of Classroom Assistants job evaluation would be 80 million. Subsequently the Minister for Education, Caitroina Ruane, announced a figure of 30 million and most recently figures of 40 and 45 million have been stated. It is the September offer of 25.2 million + 15 million buy out that Classroom Assistants are being pressurised to accept.

There are two parts to Managements offer to Classroom Assistants. Management has set a figure of 25.2 million for the job evaluation part of the offer and 15 million for the buy out of historic terms and conditions.

For Classroom Assistants and the general public, who count their wages in pounds and pence, 25.2 m and 15 m sounds like a lot of money but when it is broken down for each individual Classroom Assistant it is a very small sum of money in comparison to what they are entitled to.

I am very concerned that even this insulating offer is not what it appears to be. It seems that the offer has either been deliberately or accidentally falsified.

The Education Boards worked out this figure and then sent it to the Department of Finance and Personnel for approval. It is not clear if the Department of Education had any detailed knowledge of how this figure was calculated.


The 25.2 million is based on managements costing of back pay for the last 12 years totalling 21.7 million plus 3.5 million for this year.

It would appear that managements calculation of the 25.2 million is based on entirely false assumptions about the current and proposed pay levels for Classroom Assistants.

Although the Department of Finance and Personnel was asked to and did approve the figure of 25.5 million, Management has since admitted to all the trade unions that it is not an accurate figure.


Managements offer of a buy out is based on splitting 15 million between all Classroom Assistants. Management propose to split the money as follows:

Each Classroom Assistant with 0-5 years service will receive 1614.00

Each Classroom Assistant with more than 5 years service will receive 2479.00

I understand that Management buy out figures are based on splitting the money between 6824 Classroom Assistants.

The trade unions are claiming the following level of Classroom Assistant membership

NIPSA 3100, UNISON 2500, GMB 1570, ATL 50, T&G have not stated a figure.

In addition there are many Classroom Assistants who are not members of any trade union

The trade union figure means that there are at least 7220 Classroom Assistants in Northern Ireland.

That is a difference of at least 396 Classroom Assistants or 10.5% between the Management figure and the trade union figure.

According to the trade union figures the 15 million buy will have to be split between many more people than management is admitting.

If the trade union membership figures are true this would make a massive difference to the level of buy out for each Classroom Assistant.


The Department of Education has set aside money solely for use in the Classroom Assistants job evaluation (earmarked money).

It appears that one Board intends using job evaluation earmarked money for other purposes.

The April 2007 minutes of the SEELB Commissioners (The Direct Rule Minister and the Department of Education replaced the Board with Commissioners when the Board refused to implement cuts primarily aimed at special needs spending) state

it is unlikely that the total cost of back pay in the SEELB would be in excess of 6m, which is less than the SEELB share of the 30mCurrently the proposal is that some of the 30m allocated for back pay will be used to employ additional staff to implement the agreement.

To summarise the current situation

Management are pressurising Classroom Assistants to accept an offer which they claim is

25.2 million for job evaluation plus 15 million for a buy out which is to be split between 6824 Classroom Assistants.

The reality is that

the real value of the offer is not clear; the true figure of the number of Classroom Assistants is unclear which means that the long term impact on education budgets is unclear

It would be completely irresponsible for any trade union, the Education Boards, the Government Departments or any other interested party to accept a position where an offer has not been properly costed. The implications for Classroom Assistants, the budget for Special Needs education and the budgets of schools and Boards are enormous.

I believe that public representatives have a responsibility to investigate this situation.

I would be grateful for your views on this issue and would urge you to raise this issue publicly.

I appreciate that the details I have provided are quite complex and I am happy to meet with you if you would like clarification.

Yours Sincerely

© 2001-2020 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy