Finally, Germany Is Talking About Deutschland EU Exit - Dexit 22:57 Apr 21 0 comments The EU in 2019 – the Problem of Survival 18:42 Jan 11 0 comments The publication of a damning report on Ireland’s public services was delayed by EU until after polls... 06:50 Feb 27 2 comments People's News - No. 139 7th Feb 2016 22:58 Feb 10 0 comments Peoples News issue No. 110 Date: 21 – 9 – 14 22:01 Oct 01 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandA Blog About Human RightsUN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Lockdown Skeptics
Climate Alarm Has Become a Dangerous Ideology, Says Cambridge Academic Thu May 02, 2024 11:14 | Sallust
Civil Servants Take Legal Action to Stop Rwanda Flights by Arguing International Law Ties Their Hand... Thu May 02, 2024 09:00 | Will Jones
Chris Packham?s BBC Series Warning of ?Mass Extinction? by CO2 is Propaganda, Not Science Thu May 02, 2024 07:00 | Chris Morrison
News Round-Up Thu May 02, 2024 01:10 | Richard Eldred
Slavery Did Not Make Britain Rich, Report Finds Wed May 01, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionParis 2024 and Berlin 1936 in the service of an impossible imperial dream, by Th... Tue Apr 30, 2024 07:07 | en Georgia and the financing of political organizations from abroad Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:37 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N°84 Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:35 | en Israel's complex relations with Iran, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:25 | en Iran's hypersonic missiles generate deterrence through terror, says Scott Ritter... Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:37 | en |
Unending EU hypocracy
international |
eu |
opinion/analysis
Sunday June 22, 2008 18:05 by paul o toole pauljotoole at eircom dot net
The governments 'eventual response' will respect the outcome of the election Interviewed live on radio on the morning of the count, Dick Roche was asked a question,(at my prompt I might say, after Patricia Mckenna was asked the question, I thought it only fair that Mr Roche be asked the same) ..... ...if he would accept the result of the election or will there be a lisbon-II election if this one fails. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 2 1Think the Sunday Tribune's head line summed up the E U heads "respect" for our vote
(and indeed the opinions of most of its citizens in opinion poll after opinion poll)
"An Taoiseach, Brian Cowen, requests the pleasure of your company at a polling station near you in Spring 2009 to vote YES...or leave the EU"
An excellent analysis of the vote and the campaigns by Chekov Feeny published by the Irish Left Review is to be found below...
They're a stubborn lot, and their friends in the media will keep up the drivel, rather than move on as most of the country has.
Today on Limerick Live 95FM, they had the most novel reason for discussing the Lisbon Treaty 12 days after the vote.
I tuned in to hear Ed Myers say that he had been away during the referendum, and only found out this morning that Ireland voted no! (what a journalist eh?)
So he had on some guy to splutter on that people didn't understand the treaty, and were worried about abortion and the EU army, and that the Yes side hadn't got their act together, cos people were picking unfairly on Bertie, leaving Cowen little time to push the Treaty while the NO side were out talking to people. The caller said he hadn't voted because he didn't understand it, and people who didn't understand it shouldn't have voted at all.
Ed Myers even had the gall to waste more air time with questions like, "was it close?", "what was the margin like?"
To which his caller said it was "only 110,000".
How contrived is that, even for Ed Myers, to pretend like his researchers couldn't have provided him with that info.
He spoonfed the guy suggestions for the motives of the No side, all of them negative reasons, being scared or misinformed, or giving the two fingers to the government. He didn't suggest a single valid reason to vote No, and his guest was not likely to either, so Myers wasn't playing devil's advocate on the issue.
I'm sure that other radio stations are still flogging this dead horse in the hope of sowing seeds of doubt in people who chose their own judgment over the advice of professional liars in the Dail.
As for a FF survey one the outcome, I wouldn't trust any report from the government on why people voted no.
They would twist the results to try give justification for a re-run i.e. people voted NO for the WRONG reasons, e.g. they simply didn't understand it, so we'll do a better explanation next time.